How to comment on a

Timber Harvest Plan

in JDSF

A timber harvest plan (THP) is a legal document, both a plan and a form of environmental impact statement. Comments must be submitted within a set period of time, beginning with the date of the original filing and ending thirty days after the Pre-Harvest Inspection (PHI). For comments to be entered into the public record, they must have the THP name and number in the subject line, and be emailed to

SantaRosaPublicComment@fire.ca.gov

It is also important to cc the forester who wrote the plan, and we ask you to bcc mendocinotrailstewards@gmail.com so we can archive it.

These articles from the Environmental Protection Information Center may be helpful:

THP Comments Legal Template

How a Timber Harvest Plan Works

2018 harvest off of Road 408 in the Caspar Creek Watershed—photo by Art Mielke

2018 harvest off of Road 408 in the Caspar Creek Watershed—photo by Art Mielke

 

Letters to the Editor:

Often what you have to say about a timber harvest plan is on the emotional side and may have nothing to do with the text of the plan itself. You might not feel qualified to comment on the science, might not understand the terms. Like so many people, you could believe that, no matter what you write, the people who have the power to change the timber harvest plan are not going to listen. You could be correct; but you should submit your comments anyway. Cal Fire is only required to respond to and consider comments on the legal text of the THP. But they will still know you are there, one of a large group of people who disagree with their treatment of a place that you love.

And this is when it is so important to also send your letter to a local newspaper or two. Letters to the editor are a time-honored tradition of political engagement. Being published sends a signal to our legislators that this is an important topic. In the end, the battle could be won in the court of public opinion, but the public must actually know enough about what is happening to have an opinion. Send your comments to Cal Fire and all the other addresses on the THP concerned, but then email it to your local newspaper. It doesn’t have to be perfect, doesn’t have to address the fine points of one section or another of a document you can’t even download. You just have to speak your peace. Be respectful. Don’t demonize others, even if you are angry. Here are some addresses:

Fort Bragg Advocate and Mendocino Beacon: editor@advocate-news.com

Willits News: editorial@willitsnews.com

Santa Rosa Press Democrat: letters@pressdemocrat.com

Most papers have a limit of 200 words or less for letters to the editor.

Spent oil left behind—photo by Art Mielke

Spent oil left behind—photo by Art Mielke

 To find a timber harvest plan, go to

Cal Trees Online Timber Harvesting and Forest Regulation

You don’t need an account, just go to the ‘Search Plans’ button beneath the ‘Everyone’ heading, and enter the name of the plan or location, and the most likely span of dates during which the information was filed. Most of the time a slew of documents are available, pieced out and not word-searchable, so you have to pick and choose. Section 2 of the THP contains the most information. The geo-referenced map is valuable, but needs to be opened with an app such as Avenza. The following basic term and acronym-decoding cheat sheet will help as well.

 
Marked to Cut 120.jpg
 
Caspar 500 THP--marked to cut for the Summer of 2021—photos by Art Mielke

Caspar 500 THP--marked to cut for the Summer of 2021—photos by Art Mielke

 

THP Terminology & Decoding for the Layperson:

A Silviculture Glossary

JDSF—Jackson Demonstration State Forest

ATV—All-terrain Vehicle

BAA—Biological Assessment Area

Cal Fire—the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection

CCR—California Code of RegulationsTHP—timber harvest plan

CDFA—California Department of Food and Agriculture

CEQA—the California Environmental Quality Act

DFW—Department of Fish and Wildlife (Formerly Department of Fish and Game)

EHR—Erosion Hazard Rating

ELZ—Equipment Limitation Zones

Even-Aged Management—clearcutting

FPA—Forest Practice Act

FPR—Forest Practice Rules

LTO—Licensed Timber Operator

NSO—Northern Spotted Owl

PHI—Pre-harvest Inspection

PRC—Public Resources Code

RPF—Registered Professional Forester

Silviculture—the growing and cultivation of trees

SOD—Sudden Oak Death—Pytophthora ramorum--an algae responsible for large-scale die-offs of oaks and other tree species

WAA—Watershed Assessment Area

WLPZ—Watercourse and Lake Protection Zone

WPOP—Winter Period Operating Plan

Timber Harvest Plan Sections

Section 1 = Legal Description and Information

Section 2 = Operational Provisions of the Plan

Section 3 = Supporting Materials and Explanations (including the determination of baseline and the alternatives analysis)

Section 4 = Cumulative Impacts Analysis

Section 5 = Subject Specific Attachments

Section 6 = Confidential Archeological Info (location and nature not disclosed to prevent vandalism or disturbance)

THP Comment Cheat Sheet from the Environmental Protection Information Center in Arcata, California:

For more info, check out the Environmental Protection Information Center

Comments submitted on a THP serve a few purposes. They first make Cal Fire (or whoever submitted the THP) aware that X number of people are not in favor of this THP either at all or as it was submitted. This puts them on notice that they will face opposition. In this respect, a heartfelt opinion is sufficient. However, comments can also be used to either slow down or stop a THP, or as material in later litigation. In these cases, comments are only valuable if they are authoritative. You do not have to be an expert, but you do need to research and include citations. THPs are not usually stopped because of new studies—at least not by laypeople—but they can be slowed or cleaned up. More importantly for the regulatory process are procedural issues, ie: missed deadlines for public or agency notification and the like. As you prepare your submission develop and stick to a theme; identify the specific factual and legal issues you will address; research each issue to determine what supporting evidence you can present; remember to tie your arguments to the evidence. When you write your comments, consider the following:

~Cite “substantial evidence”

~Cite relevant rules

~Cite relevant State and Federal laws

~Cite items from the THP itself

~Cite best available science

~Cite agency reports, including past statements

~Cite alternative resources (e.g. CNDDB, CALWatershed Mapper, DPR database)

~Use letterhead with date, means of transmission, agency contact address and email

THP Comments Format

If your comments are to be more than a heartfelt plea, then they are best written in essay format, with the following guidelines:

~It should have an opening paragraph:

  • On whose behalf the comments are being submitted

  • Agency proposed action

  • Summary position statement on the proposed project

~The body of the essay needs one solid paragraph for each main point:

  • For each paragraph: Topic sentence for key issue/supporting evidence/conclusion

  • Endangered Species

  • Watersheds

  • Cumulative Impacts, etc…

~The conclusion should:

  • Restate position/ summarize argument

  • Make an “ask”

  • Request future updates on projects

~End letter with your name, title, contact info and signature

For more info, check out the Environmental Protection Information Center